Model Assumptions and Governing Equations
Model Assumptions
The mathematical model was developed under the following assumptions:
The electrochemical half-cell operates at steady-state and isothermal conditions.
The electrolyte is modeled as an incompressible, Newtonian fluid under laminar flow conditions.
The dilute solution approximation is applied to the electrolyte.
The transport of active species occurs by advection and diffusion , neglecting migration.
The electronic and ionic current densities are both described by Ohm's law .
The redox half-reaction comprises a single-electron transfer step, and the formation of intermediates or side-products is ignored.
The dilute solution approximation is valid when the electrolyte consists primarily of solvent molecules. Ignoring migration is justified when considering the presence of an excess of supporting electrolyte, relative to the concentration of active species.
Governing Equations
Momentum transport
∇ ⃗ ⋅ v ⃗ = 0 \vec{\nabla} \cdot \vec{v} = 0 ∇ ⋅ v = 0
ρ ε 2 v ⃗ ⋅ ∇ ⃗ v ⃗ = − ∇ ⃗ p + μ ε ∇ ⃗ 2 v ⃗ − μ K v ⃗ − ρ β ∣ v ⃗ ∣ v ⃗ \frac{\rho}{\varepsilon^2}\vec{v} \cdot \vec{\nabla}\vec{v} = -\vec{\nabla}p + \frac{\mu}{\varepsilon}\vec{\nabla}^2\vec{v} - \frac{\mu}{K}\vec{v} - \rho\beta|\vec{v}|\vec{v} ε 2 ρ v ⋅ ∇ v = − ∇ p + ε μ ∇ 2 v − K μ v − ρβ ∣ v ∣ v
Species transport
∇ ⃗ ⋅ ( v ⃗ C O − D O eff ∇ ⃗ C O ) = a i loc n F \vec{\nabla} \cdot \left(\vec{v}C_{\text{O}} - D_{\text{O}}^{\text{eff}}\vec{\nabla}C_{\text{O}}\right) = a\frac{i_{\text{loc}}}{nF} ∇ ⋅ ( v C O − D O eff ∇ C O ) = a n F i loc
∇ ⃗ ⋅ ( v ⃗ C R − D R eff ∇ ⃗ C R ) = − a i loc n F \vec{\nabla} \cdot \left(\vec{v}C_{\text{R}} - D_{\text{R}}^{\text{eff}}\vec{\nabla}C_{\text{R}}\right) = -a\frac{i_{\text{loc}}}{nF} ∇ ⋅ ( v C R − D R eff ∇ C R ) = − a n F i loc
Charge transport
∇ ⃗ ⋅ ( − κ eff ∇ ⃗ Φ l ) = a i loc \vec{\nabla} \cdot \left(-\kappa^{\text{eff}}\vec{\nabla}\Phi_{\text{l}}\right) = a\,i_{\text{loc}} ∇ ⋅ ( − κ eff ∇ Φ l ) = a i loc
∇ ⃗ ⋅ ( − σ eff ∇ ⃗ Φ s ) = − a i loc \vec{\nabla} \cdot \left(-\sigma^{\text{eff}}\vec{\nabla}\Phi_{\text{s}}\right) = -a\,i_{\text{loc}} ∇ ⋅ ( − σ eff ∇ Φ s ) = − a i loc
Electrochemical Kinetics
The local current density is described by the concentration-dependent Butler-Volmer equation:
i loc = i 0 [ C R s C ref exp ( α A F R T η ) − C O s C ref exp ( − α C F R T η ) ] i_{\text{loc}} = i_0 \left[\frac{C_{\text{R}}^{\text{s}}}{C_{\text{ref}}} \exp\left(\frac{\alpha_{\text{A}} F}{RT}\eta\right) - \frac{C_{\text{O}}^{\text{s}}}{C_{\text{ref}}} \exp\left(\frac{-\alpha_{\text{C}} F}{RT}\eta\right)\right] i loc = i 0 [ C ref C R s exp ( RT α A F η ) − C ref C O s exp ( RT − α C F η ) ]
where C R s C_{\text{R}}^{\text{s}} C R s and C O s C_{\text{O}}^{\text{s}} C O s are surface concentrations, and C ref C_{\text{ref}} C ref is the reference concentration at which i 0 i_0 i 0 was measured.
The local surface overpotential is defined as:
η ≡ Φ s − Φ l − E eq \eta \equiv \Phi_{\text{s}} - \Phi_{\text{l}} - E_{\text{eq}} η ≡ Φ s − Φ l − E eq
where E eq = E 0 + R T F ln ( C O C R ) E_{\text{eq}} = E^0 + \frac{RT}{F}\ln\left(\frac{C_{\text{O}}}{C_{\text{R}}}\right) E eq = E 0 + F RT ln ( C R C O ) is given by the Nernst equation.
Mass transfer limitation
A linear Nernst diffusion layer describes the mass transfer resistance near the electrode surface. At steady-state:
k m,R ( C R − C R s ) = k m,O ( C O s − C O ) = i loc n F k_{\text{m,R}}(C_{\text{R}} - C_{\text{R}}^{\text{s}}) = k_{\text{m,O}}(C_{\text{O}}^{\text{s}} - C_{\text{O}}) = \frac{i_{\text{loc}}}{nF} k m,R ( C R − C R s ) = k m,O ( C O s − C O ) = n F i loc
Using the mass transfer coefficient to eliminate surface concentrations yields:
i loc = i 0 [ C R C ref exp ( α A F R T η ) − C O C ref exp ( − α C F R T η ) ] 1 + i 0 n F k m,R C ref exp ( α A F R T η ) + i 0 n F k m,O C ref exp ( − α C F R T η ) i_{\text{loc}} = \frac{i_0 \left[\frac{C_{\text{R}}}{C_{\text{ref}}} \exp\left(\frac{\alpha_{\text{A}} F}{RT}\eta\right) - \frac{C_{\text{O}}}{C_{\text{ref}}} \exp\left(\frac{-\alpha_{\text{C}} F}{RT}\eta\right)\right]}{1 + \frac{i_0}{nFk_{\text{m,R}}C_{\text{ref}}} \exp\left(\frac{\alpha_{\text{A}} F}{RT}\eta\right) + \frac{i_0}{nFk_{\text{m,O}}C_{\text{ref}}} \exp\left(\frac{-\alpha_{\text{C}} F}{RT}\eta\right)} i loc = 1 + n F k m,R C ref i 0 exp ( RT α A F η ) + n F k m,O C ref i 0 exp ( RT − α C F η ) i 0 [ C ref C R exp ( RT α A F η ) − C ref C O exp ( RT − α C F η ) ]
See the Appendix for the detailed derivation.
Source term linearization
The non-linear source terms in the charge transport equations are linearized around the known potential field of the previous iteration n n n :
∇ ⃗ ⋅ ( − σ eff ∇ ⃗ Φ s n + 1 ) + a ( i loc n + d d Φ s n i loc n ⋅ ( Φ s n + 1 − Φ s n ) ) = 0 \vec{\nabla} \cdot \left(-\sigma^{\text{eff}}\vec{\nabla}\Phi_{\text{s}}^{n+1}\right) + a\left(i_{\text{loc}}^{n} + \frac{d}{d\Phi_{\text{s}}^n}i_{\text{loc}}^{n} \cdot (\Phi_{\text{s}}^{n+1} - \Phi_{\text{s}}^{n})\right) = 0 ∇ ⋅ ( − σ eff ∇ Φ s n + 1 ) + a ( i loc n + d Φ s n d i loc n ⋅ ( Φ s n + 1 − Φ s n ) ) = 0
The linearization of the species transport equations was not required because of the linear dependence of i loc i_{\text{loc}} i loc on C R C_{\text{R}} C R and C O C_{\text{O}} C O . See the Appendix for the detailed derivation of d d Φ s n i loc n \frac{d}{d\Phi_{\text{s}}^n}i_{\text{loc}}^{n} d Φ s n d i loc n .